By Deborah Wright

The Republican establishment’s success requires us to surrender the power of our vote to them.  They count on the intimidating power of flashing big money by running a barrage of nasty slanderous ads intended to personally and politically destroy the conservative candidate. They roll-out coerced endorsements, manipulate a complicit media and play dirty tricks with the primary election process.

The goal is to make a psychological impact on the conservative donors and voter’s confidence in their ability to maintain a voting bloc. Deteriorating confidence creates division among conservatives causing voters to surrender the power of their vote without a fight. Many conservatives make excuses for submitting to the establishment, “Santorum can’t win…Romney has the money and the big name endorsements.  Always keep in mind; no one can win without your vote.

By Deborah Wright

The pivotal issues for our nation in this Republican Primary are Obamacare and Agenda 21 (global Warming regulations). Your vote will represent your position on the issues defining freedom in the USA for generations. The decision in 2012 will either preserve freedom and reverse the socialist policies; or continue the march toward socialism at a slower nuanced pace.

Both Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney played major roles in forwarding socialist policies and propaganda creeping into every part of our lives, but Rick Santorum has not.   There are many attacks going in every direction about endorsements, earmarks, wealth and lobbying. Don’t be distracted by the minutia.

Surging Rick Santorum has opened a 15 point lead over Mitt Romney.

How to dupe conservatives into joining global warming advocates.

By Deborah Wright

In 2007 Newt Gingrich along with fellow environmentalist Terry l. Maple authored “A Contract with the Earth”. Newt Gingrich, the chameleon, demonstrates how he can comfortably communicate in the language of a true environmental extremist, making powerful leftist arguments; and when necessary, he can forcefully articulate conservatism to roaring cheers of conservatives.

According to the biography in his book, in the early 1970’s he was a professor of environmental studies at a western Georgia college.  Meet the environmentalist Newt Gingrich in his own words.

By Deborah Wright

The Gingrich supporters including many conservative talk show hosts, discussed Monday night’s Florida debate completely ignore the fact that Romney exposed a major weakness in Newt’s debating prowess.   The debate was a strong showing for Rick Santorum,   but it was dismissed because he was not as exciting as Newt was in South Carolina.  Defeating President Obama will require someone steady confident and consistent.    Santorum was wise to stay out of the muck between Romney and Gingrich; he doesn’t have money to fend off attack ads and everybody knows you don’t interfere when your opponents are self-destructing.

Newt Gingrich is not the Great-Conservative-Hope.  Many of us thought Herman Cain was the Great-Conservative-Hope, riding in on his white horse wearing a cowboy hat to rescue us from decades of weak moderate Republican leadership.   Newt Gingrich as a conservative is a myth. He knows what it means to be a conservative and can confidently articulate the values. He can do this because he is “brainy” educated and articulate.  Before you vote become acquainted with his views and actions, Google him and global warming and the United Nations.

We finally have a Republican candidate who can stand-up to the media, not back-down and fight-back. He forcefully articulates what it means to be a conservative who inspires confidence.  We can now relax knowing we have someone who shares our values and will fight for us.

Not so fast, when the exhilaration of taking on the liberal media and winning subsides we are faced with the sobering knowledge that Newt Gingrich is a progressive conservative.  Gingrich is conservative on many issues and he says he is for small government, while at the same time supporting man-made global warming which is the precursor to Agenda 21.  He has attempted to renounce the video of him and Nancy Pelosi pushing regulations to address man-made global warming.

There is nothing more big government progressive than of course Obamacare.  He supported the individual mandate, the linchpin tenet of Obamacare, and now has “changed” his mind since he began running as a conservative. The individual mandate, to emphasis the significance, creates big government power to demand that a citizen purchase something -- in this case healthcare.

By Deborah Wright

The New Hampshire Republican Presidential Primary debates were a window into the liberal mind.  The questions were framed from a holier-than-thou secular humanist perspective, looking down on people who disagree politically. The ABC panel’s questions targeted Rick Santorum because of his great showing in Iowa, polling second place in South Carolina and his willingness to openly engage on social issues. Newt Gingrich rightfully defended the faith from the onslaught of demonizing questions from the media designed to paint conservative Republicans as extremist while giving liberal Democrats a pass on their truly outrageously radically extreme socialist, communist and immoral policies.

In an effort to demonstrate Christian beliefs to be extreme, an inordinate amount of time was wasted discussing contraceptives (something without national controversy) and gay marriage, while the more serious questions about the economy and foreign policy received short shrift.

Everyone has standards of right and wrong.  Atheists and social liberals believe it is wrong to follow the Bible and Bible believers know the Bible to be the inspired Word of God.  Some liberals attend church and are Christians who accept and reject commandments and teachings deciding what they will follow, thus the phrase “cafeteria Christians”. 

Believers use the Bible as guidance to make important life decisions and the basis for a philosophy about freedom and civil society, following in the footsteps of our founding fathers. Liberals adhere to moral relativism or situational morality, which is a moving target subject to change.

By Rosalyn Tademy

To the 58 Herman Cain supporters who wrote in his name???  That small number of votes would have given Santorum the election! (FYI - Santorum also won the women's vote in Iowa 27% to Romney's 25 %!) .   The vote count was not without controversy this youtube video Iowa GOP Responds To Vote Discrepancy. The result of the election is an 8 vote victory 30,015 Mitt to 30,007 for Santorum.  Regardless of the outcome of the controversy, it is a win for Santorum.  

Ron Paul is on the hunt against Santorum – some of their latest comments are Santorum is supporting big government line.  Anyone who does not agree with Paul and is not conservative…THIS IS BOGUS - don't get fooled people because of not doing your homework or understanding the tactics of Ron Paul.

The Democrats are bouncing of the wall because they feel they have a gotcha for Rick Santorum.  They found an opportunity to use their magic word, “racist”. Santorum said, he misspoke and he was clearly stumbling over his words in the video.      They ignored his entire comment and the intent of his statement.